People v. Wilkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wilkins

2017 NY Slip Op 35, 146 A.D.3d 427, 43 N.Y.S.3d 745

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 1038 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 3, 2017·No. 2631 1861/14·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered September 17, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due delibera *428 tion having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered September 17, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due delibera *428 tion having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

People v. Wilkins, 2017 NY Slip Op 35, 146 A.D.3d 427, 43 N.Y.S.3d 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 35 (People v. Wilkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.