People v. Wilkins

73 A.D.3d 467, 899 N.Y.S.2d 616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 A.D.3d 847

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered February 26, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and attempted forgery in the second degree (two counts) and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s general objection (see People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879 [1994]) failed to preserve his argument that the People’s expert on altered MetroCards invaded the jury’s province by expressing an opinion on the ultimate issue of intent, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the testimony was permissible (see People v Hicks, 2 NY3d 750, 751 [2004]; People v Kanner, 272 AD2d 866, 867 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 867 [2000]), and that, in any event, any error in this regard was harmless. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilkins, 73 A.D.3d 467, 899 N.Y.S.2d 616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 467 (People v. Wilkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hicks
811 N.E.2d 7 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Tevaha
644 N.E.2d 1342 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Kanner
272 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)