People v. Wilkerson

162 Ill. App. 76, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 537
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMay 26, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 Ill. App. 76 (People v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wilkerson, 162 Ill. App. 76, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 537 (Ill. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor in the town of Champaign, the same being alleged to be anti-saloon territory, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50.

The judgment must be reversed because of the absence of any proof in the record that the alleged sale of intoxicating liquor was made in the town of Champaign.

The insistence of counsel for defendant in error that the court will take judicial notice that the corner of Main and Walnut streets in the city of Champaign is within the territorial limits of the town of Champaign is not tenable. In Gunning v. The People, 189 Ill. 165, it was held that the court would not take judicial notice that certain streets mentioned in the record were in the city of Chicago.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Causey v. Swift & Co.
196 S.E. 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 Ill. App. 76, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilkerson-illappct-1911.