People v. Wiley

193 A.D.2d 1062, 600 N.Y.S.2d 671
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 28, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 1062 (People v. Wiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wiley, 193 A.D.2d 1062, 600 N.Y.S.2d 671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of his right to be present at an unrecorded Sandoval hearing. The record does not disclose who was present at that hearing. Thus, we remit for a reconstruction of the hearing to determine, inter alia, whether defendant was present (see, People v Mitchell, 192 AD2d 1137). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wiley
203 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 A.D.2d 1062, 600 N.Y.S.2d 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wiley-nyappdiv-1993.