People v. Wilder

270 A.D.2d 368, 704 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilder. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 A.D.2d 750

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), rendered June 22, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People provided adequate assurances of the identity and unchanged condition of the narcotics entered into evidence at trial (see, People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340; People v Brathwaite, 204 AD2d 733).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilder, 270 A.D.2d 368, 704 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 368 (People v. Wilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Brathwaite
204 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)