People v. Wilder

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Wilder

192 N.W.2d 375, 35 Mich. App. 416

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9006

StatusPublished

This text of 192 N.W.2d 375 (People v. Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wilder, 192 N.W.2d 375, 35 Mich. App. 416 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to the crime of felonious assault, MCLA § 750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277), and appeals claiming the complaint was invalid because it was not signed by an eyewitness to the crime. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to the crime of felonious assault, MCLA § 750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277), and appeals claiming the complaint was invalid because it was not signed by an eyewitness to the crime. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.W.2d 375, 35 Mich. App. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilder-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack