People v. Wilder

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Wilder

192 N.W.2d 375, 35 Mich. App. 416

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilder. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 Mich. App. 280 →

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 1971·No. Docket No. 9006·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to the crime of felonious assault, MCLA § 750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277), and appeals claiming the complaint was invalid because it was not signed by an eyewitness to the crime. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to the crime of felonious assault, MCLA § 750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277), and appeals claiming the complaint was invalid because it was not signed by an eyewitness to the crime. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

People v. Wilder, 192 N.W.2d 375, 35 Mich. App. 416 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

192 N.W.2d 375 (People v. Wilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related