People v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wilcox

251 A.D.2d 189, 675 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 189 (People v. Wilcox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wilcox, 251 A.D.2d 189, 675 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered April 20, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 to 6 years and 4V2 to 9 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the hearing court’s credibility determinations, and find that the officer’s testimony amply supported the court’s finding that the drugs were in plain view. Concur— Lerner, P. J., Rubin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered April 20, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 to 6 years and 4V2 to 9 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the hearing court’s credibility determinations, and find that the officer’s testimony amply supported the court’s finding that the drugs were in plain view. Concur— Lerner, P. J., Rubin, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 189, 675 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilcox-nyappdiv-1998.