People v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wilcox

147 A.D.2d 667, 538 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1967

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 A.D.2d 667 (People v. Wilcox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wilcox, 147 A.D.2d 667, 538 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered December 1, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant’s pro se claim of ineffective assistance of trial [668]*668counsel is based on matters which are dehors the record and thus is not reviewable on direct appeal. His appropriate remedy is a postconviction proceeding pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Candelaria, 139 AD2d 752). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered December 1, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant’s pro se claim of ineffective assistance of trial [668]*668counsel is based on matters which are dehors the record and thus is not reviewable on direct appeal. His appropriate remedy is a postconviction proceeding pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Candelaria, 139 AD2d 752). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 667, 538 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilcox-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack