People v. Wiggins

17 A.D.3d 196, 792 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wiggins. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 A.D.3d 634

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J.), rendered March 26, 2002, as amended on or about March 24, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 10 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, after granting defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion to set aside sentence, the court should not have resentenced defendant without conducting a new sentencing proceeding at which defendant and his counsel would be present and have the opportunity to be heard (People v Green, 54 NY2d 878 [1981]).

In view of the remand for resentencing, it is unnecessary to determine whether defendant’s sentence is excessive. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wiggins, 17 A.D.3d 196, 792 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

17 A.D.3d 196 (People v. Wiggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Green
429 N.E.2d 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)