People v. Wiggins

198 A.D.2d 535, 605 N.Y.S.2d 936
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 1993·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered July 9, 1992, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, by pleading guilty, forfeited his right to appellate review of his contention that he should have been granted a preliminary hearing on the felony complaint (see, People v Beattie, 80 NY2d 840; People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1; People v Di Raffaele, 55 NY2d 234; People v Baldwin, 130 AD2d 497).

In light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history, we do not find the sentence imposed to be excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We find no merit to the defendant’s remaining contention. Eiber, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wiggins, 198 A.D.2d 535, 605 N.Y.S.2d 936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 535 (People v. Wiggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Best
2020 NY Slip Op 04754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Wiggins
54 A.D.3d 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Henderson
269 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)