People v. Wiggins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wiggins

48 A.D.2d 934, 369 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Wiggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wiggins, 48 A.D.2d 934, 369 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered June 13, 1973 on resentencing, convicting him of attempted reckless endangerment in the first degree (Indictment No. 995/72) and attempted possession of weapons and dangerous instruments and appliances as a felony (Indictment No. 716/73), upon pleas of guilty. Judgment under Indictment No. 716/73 affirmed. Judgment under Indictment No. 995/72 reversed, on the law, and said indictment dismissed. The 10-month delay between the filing of Indictment No. 995/72 and defendant’s arraignment thereunder, together with the concession made by [935]*935the People that no reasonable excuse for the delay exists, warrants reversal of the conviction thereon and dismissal of that indictment (cf. People v Valentin, 46 AD2d 906). Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered June 13, 1973 on resentencing, convicting him of attempted reckless endangerment in the first degree (Indictment No. 995/72) and attempted possession of weapons and dangerous instruments and appliances as a felony (Indictment No. 716/73), upon pleas of guilty. Judgment under Indictment No. 716/73 affirmed. Judgment under Indictment No. 995/72 reversed, on the law, and said indictment dismissed. The 10-month delay between the filing of Indictment No. 995/72 and defendant’s arraignment thereunder, together with the concession made by [935]*935the People that no reasonable excuse for the delay exists, warrants reversal of the conviction thereon and dismissal of that indictment (cf. People v Valentin, 46 AD2d 906). Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 934, 369 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wiggins-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack