People v. Whitted
124 A.D.2d 846, 508 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62186
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to permit a rational trier of facts to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). The mere existence of conflicting evidence did not preclude the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196) and the jury’s findings on the issues of credibility are to be accorded the greatest weight on appeal (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Whitted, 124 A.D.2d 846, 508 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
124 A.D.2d 846 (People v. Whitted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Irving
135 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)