People v. Whittaker

184 A.D.2d 1031, 586 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8270

This text of 184 A.D.2d 1031 (People v. Whittaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Whittaker, 184 A.D.2d 1031, 586 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8270 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: When viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428), the evidence is sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt of resisting arrest (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). In view of defendant’s criminal record, the sentence imposed was neither harsh and excessive nor an abuse of discretion (see, People v Dittmar, 41 AD2d 788). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, La Mendola, J. — Resisting Arrest.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ford
488 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Dittmar
41 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D.2d 1031, 586 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-whittaker-nyappdiv-1992.