People v. Whitmore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Whitmore

139 A.D.2d 547, 526 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3755

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.2d 547 (People v. Whitmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Whitmore, 139 A.D.2d 547, 526 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), all rendered April 17, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 4623/85, robbery in the second degree (three counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (two counts), possession of burglar’s tools, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree under indictment No. 4679/85; and violation of probation under superior court information No. 1858/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), all rendered April 17, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 4623/85, robbery in the second degree (three counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (two counts), possession of burglar’s tools, and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree under indictment No. 4679/85; and violation of probation under superior court information No. 1858/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 547, 526 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-whitmore-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack