People v. Whitmore
273 N.E.2d 318, 29 N.Y.2d 646, 324 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1155
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether appellant’s rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated by the denial of his motion for a pretrial identification hearing. The Court of Appeals held there was no denial of appellant’s constitutional rights. [See 28 N Y 2d 826.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Whitmore, 273 N.E.2d 318, 29 N.Y.2d 646, 324 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1155 (N.Y. 1971).
273 N.E.2d 318 (People v. Whitmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States
466 F.2d 1059 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)