People v. Whitfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Whitfield

133 A.D.3d 527, 19 N.Y.S.3d 426

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 2015·No. 16215 1251/13·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered on or about July 11, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence *528 not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered on or about July 11, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence *528 not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

People v. Whitfield, 133 A.D.3d 527, 19 N.Y.S.3d 426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

133 A.D.3d 527 (People v. Whitfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.