People v. Whitely

27 P. 1104, 64 Cal. 211, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 602
California Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 1883·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

think it appears that the examination was before a police magistrate. The commitment is signed by “James Lawler, Judge of the Police Judge’s Court No. 2, of the city and county of San Francisco.”

The defendant ivas charged with the crime of grand larceny, and the jury, by their verdict, found her “ guilty as charged.” This was a sufficient finding of the degree.

Judgment and orders appealed from affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Whitely, 27 P. 1104, 64 Cal. 211, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 602 (Cal. 1883).

27 P. 1104 (People v. Whitely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sachau
248 P. 960 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
Inklebarger v. State
1912 OK CR 407 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1912)
People v. Kent
10 P.R. 325 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1906)
McLane v. Territory
71 P. 938 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1903)
State v. McDonald
91 N.W. 447 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1902)
State v. Kelliher
50 P. 532 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1897)
People v. Perez
25 P. 262 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
People v. Manners
11 P. 643 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
People v. Price
7 P. 745 (California Supreme Court, 1885)