People v. Whitehead

49 A.D.3d 1242, 852 N.Y.2d 879
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the bargained-for sentence is not rendered unduly harsh or severe by the fact that two of the codefendants received lesser sentences than defendant (see People v Jones, 4 AD3d 796, 797 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 801 [2004]; see generally People v Fernandez, 30 AD3d 626, 627 [2006]), and the sentence otherwise is not unduly harsh or severe. Present-Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Whitehead, 49 A.D.3d 1242, 852 N.Y.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 1242 (People v. Whitehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Shaffner
96 A.D.3d 1689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
SHAFFNER, JOSEPH G., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012