People v. White

158 A.D.2d 565, 551 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find it legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review any issue of law with respect to his current argument that the court erred in discharging a juror (see, People v McGee, 152 AD2d 601; People v Fernandez, 137 AD2d 709). The defendant also failed to preserve for appellate review his current argument that the court erred in failing to invite him to make a statement prior to the imposition of sentence (see, People v Green, 54 NY2d 878, 880).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see also, People v Tirado, 158 AD2d 564 [decided herewith]). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. White, 158 A.D.2d 565, 551 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 565 (People v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Colon
210 A.D.2d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Tirado
158 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)