People v. White-Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. White-Douglas

282 A.D.2d 482, 722 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 A.D.2d 482 (People v. White-Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. White-Douglas, 282 A.D.2d 482, 722 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), dated February 24, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.40 (1).

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion is denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

Upon our review of the factors set forth in CPL 210.40 (1), we conclude that the dismissal of the indictment in this case was not warranted (see, CPL 210.40 [1]; People v Nadeem, 276 AD2d 567; People v Crespo, 244 AD2d 563, 564; People v Lagnese, 236 AD2d 629; People v Hudson, 217 AD2d 53). Altman, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), dated February 24, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.40 (1).

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion is denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

Upon our review of the factors set forth in CPL 210.40 (1), we conclude that the dismissal of the indictment in this case was not warranted (see, CPL 210.40 [1]; People v Nadeem, 276 AD2d 567; People v Crespo, 244 AD2d 563, 564; People v Lagnese, 236 AD2d 629; People v Hudson, 217 AD2d 53). Altman, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 482, 722 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-white-douglas-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack