People v. Whitaker

140 A.D.3d 578, 33 N.Y.S.3d 692
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 23, 2016
Docket1537 2319/03
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 578 (People v. Whitaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Whitaker, 140 A.D.3d 578, 33 N.Y.S.3d 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about October 15, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*579 Defendant’s challenge to the court’s calculation of his point score is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, while the court did make a calculation error, it caused no prejudice, because the record clearly establishes that the correct score is 150, which is well in excess of the threshold for a level three adjudication, and that there is no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). Under the circumstances, a remand for further proceedings would serve no useful purpose.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Whitaker
28 N.Y.3d 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.3d 578, 33 N.Y.S.3d 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-whitaker-nyappdiv-2016.