People v. Weston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Weston

223 A.D.2d 661, 637 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Weston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Weston, 223 A.D.2d 661, 637 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered December 22, 1994, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s assertion on appeal, the first count of the indictment, which designated the crime with which the defendant was charged by name and section number and tracked the language of the relevant Penal Law provision, was not jurisdictionally defective (see, People v Levin, 57 NY2d 1008; People v Cohen, 52 NY2d 584; People v Willett, 102 NY 251; People v Salvato, 111 AD2d 773).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered December 22, 1994, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s assertion on appeal, the first count of the indictment, which designated the crime with which the defendant was charged by name and section number and tracked the language of the relevant Penal Law provision, was not jurisdictionally defective (see, People v Levin, 57 NY2d 1008; People v Cohen, 52 NY2d 584; People v Willett, 102 NY 251; People v Salvato, 111 AD2d 773).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 661, 637 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weston-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack