People v. Westfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Westfield

15 A.D.3d 681, 789 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 681 (People v. Westfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Westfield, 15 A.D.3d 681, 789 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered May 24, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After the presentation of their evidence against the defendant to the grand jury, the People withdrew the case at the defendant’s request to allow him the opportunity to present his own evidence. The defendant did not present his evidence before the [682]*682grand jury’s term ended. Thus, the People resubmitted the case to a subsequent grand jury, which indicted the defendant on several counts of robbery.

Under the circumstances of this case, it was not reversible error for the People to resubmit the charges against the defendant without obtaining permission of the court (compare People v Aarons, 2 NY3d 547 [2004], with People v Montanez, 90 NY2d 690 [1997], and People v Wilkins, 68 NY2d 269 [1986]; see People v Castillo, 208 AD2d 944, 945 [1994]). Luciano, J.P, Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered May 24, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After the presentation of their evidence against the defendant to the grand jury, the People withdrew the case at the defendant’s request to allow him the opportunity to present his own evidence. The defendant did not present his evidence before the [682]*682grand jury’s term ended. Thus, the People resubmitted the case to a subsequent grand jury, which indicted the defendant on several counts of robbery.

Under the circumstances of this case, it was not reversible error for the People to resubmit the charges against the defendant without obtaining permission of the court (compare People v Aarons, 2 NY3d 547 [2004], with People v Montanez, 90 NY2d 690 [1997], and People v Wilkins, 68 NY2d 269 [1986]; see People v Castillo, 208 AD2d 944, 945 [1994]). Luciano, J.P, Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 681, 789 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-westfield-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack