People v. Wells

306 A.D.2d 296, 760 N.Y.S.2d 343
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 2, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 296 (People v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wells, 306 A.D.2d 296, 760 N.Y.S.2d 343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered August 8, 2000, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]).

Further, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Lane, 60 NY2d 748 [1983]; People v Vargas, 150 AD2d 513 [1989]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wells
8 A.D.3d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 A.D.2d 296, 760 N.Y.S.2d 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wells-nyappdiv-2003.