People v. Wellman

142 A.D.3d 879, 37 N.Y.S.3d 879
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2016·No. 1730 1658/87·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Seth L. Marvin, J.), entered on or about February 26, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly assessed points under the risk factor for failure to accept responsibility (see e.g. People v Fortin, 29 AD3d 765, 766 [2d Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 712 [2006]). Given defendant’s prison disciplinary record, the court also correctly assessed points under the risk factor for unsatisfactory conduct while confined. However, since the People failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that defendant engaged in sexual misconduct while in prison, the assessment under the risk factor for conduct while confined should only have been 10 points rather than 20. Even with a reduction of 10 points, defendant remains a level three offender, and, given the heinousness of the underlying crime against a young child, we find no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wellman, 142 A.D.3d 879, 37 N.Y.S.3d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 879 (People v. Wellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Fortin
29 A.D.3d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)