People v. Weissbach
103 A.D.3d 758, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 2013·Published
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed March 16, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
[759] Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Leventhal, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Weissbach, 103 A.D.3d 758, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
103 A.D.3d 758 (People v. Weissbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)