People v. Weissbach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Weissbach

103 A.D.3d 758, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 103 A.D.3d 758 (People v. Weissbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Weissbach, 103 A.D.3d 758, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed March 16, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

[759]*759Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Leventhal, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed March 16, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

[759]*759Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Leventhal, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.3d 758, 959 N.Y.S.2d 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weissbach-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack