People v. Weinstein

185 N.E.2d 905, 12 N.Y.2d 673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Weinstein. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 N.Y.2d 1098
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 1962·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States as follows: Defendant contended that admission into evidence of material obtained in the course of an allegedly illegal search and seizure and a confession allegedly involuntary as a matter of law was a denial and depriva[674]*674tion of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such denial or deprivation. [See 11 N- Y 2d 1098.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Weinstein, 185 N.E.2d 905, 12 N.Y.2d 673 (N.Y. 1962).

185 N.E.2d 905 (People v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.