People v. Weinberg
This text of 146 Misc. 2d 441 (People v. Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[442]*442OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed, on the law, and parking summons dismissed.
The parking summons in the case at bar is akin to appearance tickets issued in accordance with CPL 150.10 and 150.20. An appearance ticket, however, is not an accusatory instrument, and its filing does not give a criminal court jurisdiction over the defendant. CPL 150.50 requires that prior to the return date of an appearance ticket a legally sufficient information or misdemeanor complaint shall be filed. Upon failure to file with the court a proper accusatory instrument, the doctrine of stare decisis mandates reversal and dismissal of the summons (see, People v Cooperman, NYLJ, Jan. 17, 1989, at 26, col 4 [App Term, 9th & 10th Judicial Dists]).
DiPaola, P. J., Stark and Collins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 Misc. 2d 441, 558 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1990 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weinberg-nyappterm-1990.