People v. Weight

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Weight

21 Mich. App. 94

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 1970

DocketDocket No. 4,055

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Mich. App. 94 (People v. Weight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Weight, 21 Mich. App. 94 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant William Wright and a co-defendant, Jonas Powell, were arrested and charged with robbery armed, contrary to MOLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 28.797), following the robbery of a taxicab driver in the men’s restroom of a service station in February, 1967. Both defendants were found guilty after jury trial in recorder’s court for the city of Detroit. Defendant Wright was sentenced to from four to ten years in prison and has appealed.

Defendant questions the sufficiency of the evidence offered by the people in support of the jury’s verdict of guilty. An examination of the record on appeal indicates that the evidence was such that, if believed, a jury might find the defendant guilty as charged.

The testimony of the complaining witness as to the use of a dangerous weapon, a knife, was sufficient under the holding of this Court in People v. Boxx (1969), 16 Mich App 724.

The finding of the jury is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant William Wright and a co-defendant, Jonas Powell, were arrested and charged with robbery armed, contrary to MOLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 28.797), following the robbery of a taxicab driver in the men’s restroom of a service station in February, 1967. Both defendants were found guilty after jury trial in recorder’s court for the city of Detroit. Defendant Wright was sentenced to from four to ten years in prison and has appealed.

Defendant questions the sufficiency of the evidence offered by the people in support of the jury’s verdict of guilty. An examination of the record on appeal indicates that the evidence was such that, if believed, a jury might find the defendant guilty as charged.

The testimony of the complaining witness as to the use of a dangerous weapon, a knife, was sufficient under the holding of this Court in People v. Boxx (1969), 16 Mich App 724.

The finding of the jury is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Mich. App. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weight-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack