People v. Weems

23 A.D.2d 701, 258 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4592
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 31, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of three counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of assault in the second degree with intent to commit rape, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The evidence warranted the conviction. The defendant made no motion, prior to or at the trial, to suppress the evidence which he now contends was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure; nor did he object to the introduction of said evidence at the trial. Therefore, his contention on this appeal that the evidence was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure comes too late to be of any avail (People v. McCall, 19 A D 2d 630; People v. La Palia, 21 A D 2d 811; People v. Frióla, 11 N Y 2d 157). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Weems, 23 A.D.2d 701, 258 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 701 (People v. Weems) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related