People v. Weeks

210 A.D.2d 517, 620 N.Y.S.2d 1010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Weeks. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D.2d 432

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered November 19, 1992, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Weeks, 210 A.D.2d 517, 620 N.Y.S.2d 1010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 517 (People v. Weeks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)