People v. Weeks

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Weeks

212 N.E.2d 60, 16 N.Y.2d 896, 264 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1072

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 N.E.2d 60 (People v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Weeks, 212 N.E.2d 60, 16 N.Y.2d 896, 264 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1072 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Burke dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Division and to direct the grant of coram nobis relief upon the ground that defendant was entitled, as a matter of constitutional law, to timely notice following his conviction either from the trial court or from his trial counsel of his right to appeal, the time within which such appeal must be taken and the applicable procedure to he followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Burke dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Division and to direct the grant of coram nobis relief upon the ground that defendant was entitled, as a matter of constitutional law, to timely notice following his conviction either from the trial court or from his trial counsel of his right to appeal, the time within which such appeal must be taken and the applicable procedure to he followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 N.E.2d 60, 16 N.Y.2d 896, 264 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weeks-ny-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack