People v. Webster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Webster

263 A.D.2d 961, 693 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7937

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D.2d 961 (People v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Webster, 263 A.D.2d 961, 693 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to move to withdraw her plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and therefore failed to preserve for our review her contention that the plea colloquy was insufficient (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Nor is this one of those rare cases in which defendant’s recitation of the underlying facts “casts significant doubt upon the defendant’s guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea” (People v Lopez, supra, at [962]*962666). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to move to withdraw her plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and therefore failed to preserve for our review her contention that the plea colloquy was insufficient (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Nor is this one of those rare cases in which defendant’s recitation of the underlying facts “casts significant doubt upon the defendant’s guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea” (People v Lopez, supra, at [962]*962666). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D.2d 961, 693 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-webster-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack