People v. Webber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Webber

215 A.D.2d 183, 626 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 183 (People v. Webber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Webber, 215 A.D.2d 183, 626 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered August 4, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to 5Vi to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly excluded from the time chargeable to the People, for the purpose of CPL 30.30, the period from December 12, 1990 to August 24, 1992, during which time a bench warrant was outstanding for defendant’s arrest, since the People established that his location was unknown and could not be determined by due diligence (see, People v Bolden, 81 NY2d 146). The record at the speedy trial hearing established that the warrant squad detective assigned to this matter expended considerable effort in attempting to locate defendant at his out-of-State address and that the detective exhausted all reasonable investigative leads as to defendant’s whereabouts (People v Marrin, 187 AD2d 284, Iv denied 81 NY2d 843).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.), rendered August 4, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to 5Vi to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly excluded from the time chargeable to the People, for the purpose of CPL 30.30, the period from December 12, 1990 to August 24, 1992, during which time a bench warrant was outstanding for defendant’s arrest, since the People established that his location was unknown and could not be determined by due diligence (see, People v Bolden, 81 NY2d 146). The record at the speedy trial hearing established that the warrant squad detective assigned to this matter expended considerable effort in attempting to locate defendant at his out-of-State address and that the detective exhausted all reasonable investigative leads as to defendant’s whereabouts (People v Marrin, 187 AD2d 284, Iv denied 81 NY2d 843).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 183, 626 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-webber-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack