People v. Webb

California Court of Appeal

People v. Webb

55 Cal. App. 137

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 10, 1921

DocketCrim. No. 574

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cal. App. 137 (People v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Webb, 55 Cal. App. 137 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery. He duly moved for a new trial and his motion was denied. This appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying such motion.

The transcript on appeal was filed herein June 4,1921. Appellant’s time to file his opening brief was extended to July 9, 1921. The cause was regularly placed on the November calendar for argument. No brief has been filed and counsel for appellant did not appear on the day set for the oral argument. At the time set for argument, on motion of the attorney-general, the cause was submitted [138]*138on the record. It must be assumed that the appeal has been abandoned. (People v. Martinez, 43 Cal. App. 746 [185 Pac. 482].)

An examination of the record discloses no error and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery. He duly moved for a new trial and his motion was denied. This appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying such motion.

The transcript on appeal was filed herein June 4,1921. Appellant’s time to file his opening brief was extended to July 9, 1921. The cause was regularly placed on the November calendar for argument. No brief has been filed and counsel for appellant did not appear on the day set for the oral argument. At the time set for argument, on motion of the attorney-general, the cause was submitted [138]*138on the record. It must be assumed that the appeal has been abandoned. (People v. Martinez, 43 Cal. App. 746 [185 Pac. 482].)

An examination of the record discloses no error and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cal. App. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-webb-calctapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack