People v. Weaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Weaver

266 A.D.2d 66, 698 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11600

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 66 (People v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Weaver, 266 A.D.2d 66, 698 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered March 7, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning such matters as credibility, identification, and defendant’s opportunity to divest himself of the buy money after the sale. Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered March 7, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning such matters as credibility, identification, and defendant’s opportunity to divest himself of the buy money after the sale. Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 66, 698 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weaver-nyappdiv-1999.