People v. Weathersby
This text of 376 N.E.2d 908 (People v. Weathersby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Inasmuch as the offenses of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree are both class A-III felonies subject to the same penal sanctions, the former cannot be a lesser inclusory concurrent count with respect to the latter within the meaning of CPL 300.40 (subd 3, par [b]). CPL 300.40 makes provision with respect to lesser and greater counts but not for equivalent counts. Nor do we find any merit to defendant’s contention that there is insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 N.E.2d 908, 44 N.Y.2d 686, 44 N.Y. 686, 405 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-weathersby-ny-1978.