People v. Weakfall

2017 NY Slip Op 5391, 151 A.D.3d 1966, 54 N.Y.S.3d 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 2017·No. 929 KA 15-00237·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Vincent M. Dinolfo, J.), rendered August 7, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal mischief in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal mischief in the second degree (Penal Law § 145.10). Defendant forfeited his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence by pleading guilty (see People v Feidner, 109 AD3d 1086, 1086 [2013]). Indeed, “it would be logically inconsistent to permit a defendant to enter a plea of guilty based on particular admitted facts, yet to allow that defendant contemporaneously to reserve the right to challenge on appeal the sufficiency of those facts to support a conviction, had there been a trial” (People v Plunkett, 19 NY3d 400, 405-406 [2012]). Furthermore, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present—Peradotto, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Curran and Troutman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Weakfall, 2017 NY Slip Op 5391, 151 A.D.3d 1966, 54 N.Y.S.3d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5391 (People v. Weakfall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stehm
2024 NY Slip Op 02446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Cossette
2021 NY Slip Op 06285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)