People v. Watts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Watts

136 A.D.2d 580, 523 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 350

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.2d 580 (People v. Watts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Watts, 136 A.D.2d 580, 523 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), rendered February 7, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 906).

[581]*581The issues raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), rendered February 7, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 906).

[581]*581The issues raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.2d 580, 523 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-watts-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack