People v. Watts

29 A.D.2d 878, 289 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4454
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Watts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Watts, 29 A.D.2d 878, 289 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 18, 1966, affirmed. Although a Huntley hearing was requested and held, no proof was submitted on the issue of the voluntariness of the alleged oral statement; nor was such proof elicited on the trial. In fact it was always defendant’s contention that he had never made the oral statement attributed to him by the police officer. Thus, People v. Mials (27 A D 2d 944) and People v. Pensing (27 A D 2d 838, affd. 20 N Y 2d 936) are clearly distinguishable. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Soto
147 Misc. 2d 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Cefaro
244 N.E.2d 42 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.2d 878, 289 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-watts-nyappdiv-1968.