People v. Watson

134 A.D.3d 745, 19 N.Y.S.3d 784
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 A.D.3d 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2015·No. 2014-09393·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered September 11, 2014, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty should be vacated because the prosecutor allegedly misrepresented that he would provide a laboratory report to the defendant at the sentencing proceeding is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Andrades, 119 AD3d 951 [2014]; People v Murphy, 55 AD3d 930 [2008]) and, in any event, based on matter dehors the record (see People v Mallayev, 120 AD3d 1358, 1359-1360 [2014]). Mastro, J.P., Hall, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Watson, 134 A.D.3d 745, 19 N.Y.S.3d 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 745 (People v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Andrades
119 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Mallayev
120 A.D.3d 1358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Murphy
55 A.D.3d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)