People v. Watson

307 A.D.2d 939, 762 N.Y.S.2d 885
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D.2d 691

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered February 19, 2002, convicting her of arson in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of her, and comments on summation, regarding her failure to call the 911 emergency telephone number are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the prosecutor’s questions and comments were proper since they bore on the defendant’s credibility concerning her testimony that a prosecution witness set the fire (see People v Narine, 261 AD2d 421, 422 [1999]; People v Weir, 120 AD2d 554, 555 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Townes, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Watson, 307 A.D.2d 939, 762 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 939 (People v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Weir
120 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Narine
261 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)