People v. Watson

152 A.D.2d 955, 544 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9839

This text of 152 A.D.2d 955 (People v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Watson, 152 A.D.2d 955, 544 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant asserts that his statement to the police should have been suppressed because it was induced by a promise by the police that he would not be prosecuted if he returned the stolen property. We disagree. The police officer who questioned defendant denied making such promise and the suppression court found that no promises were made. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — grand larceny, second degree.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A.D.2d 955, 544 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-watson-nyappdiv-1989.