People v. Watson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Watson

27 A.D.2d 755, 279 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4763

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 A.D.2d 987 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1967·Published

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, [756]*7561966, reversed, on the law; and motion in the nature of coram nobis granted to the extent that it is directed that a hearing be held on the issues raised. The proceeding is remitted to the court below for the purpose of holding such hearing; and it is directed that the hearing be held before a Justice other than the one who presided at the sentencing. No questions of fact were considered. The factual allegations are sufficient on their face to require a hearing (People v. Elfe, 18 N Y 2d 601). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, [756]*7561966, reversed, on the law; and motion in the nature of coram nobis granted to the extent that it is directed that a hearing be held on the issues raised. The proceeding is remitted to the court below for the purpose of holding such hearing; and it is directed that the hearing be held before a Justice other than the one who presided at the sentencing. No questions of fact were considered. The factual allegations are sufficient on their face to require a hearing (People v. Elfe, 18 N Y 2d 601). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

People v. Watson, 27 A.D.2d 755, 279 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

27 A.D.2d 755 (People v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.