People v. Watson
This text of 27 A.D.2d 755 (People v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, [756]*7561966, reversed, on the law; and motion in the nature of coram nobis granted to the extent that it is directed that a hearing be held on the issues raised. The proceeding is remitted to the court below for the purpose of holding such hearing; and it is directed that the hearing be held before a Justice other than the one who presided at the sentencing. No questions of fact were considered. The factual allegations are sufficient on their face to require a hearing (People v. Elfe, 18 N Y 2d 601). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 755, 279 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-watson-nyappdiv-1967.