People v. Watkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Watkins

23 A.D.2d 670, 257 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 670 (People v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Watkins, 23 A.D.2d 670, 257 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 27, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, sentencing him to serve an indeterminate term of 10 to 30 years on the robbery count and a concurrent term of 2% to 5 years on the assault count, and committing him to the Elmira Reception Center for classification, program training and transfer pursuant to article 3-A of the Correction Law. Judgment affirmed. We find no reversible error. Nor may it be held that the court abused its discretion by not fixing a reformatory [671]*671term pursuant to section 2184-a of the Penal Law (People v. Doran, 2 A D 2d 890; People v. Allen, 5 A D 2d 696). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 27, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, sentencing him to serve an indeterminate term of 10 to 30 years on the robbery count and a concurrent term of 2% to 5 years on the assault count, and committing him to the Elmira Reception Center for classification, program training and transfer pursuant to article 3-A of the Correction Law. Judgment affirmed. We find no reversible error. Nor may it be held that the court abused its discretion by not fixing a reformatory [671]*671term pursuant to section 2184-a of the Penal Law (People v. Doran, 2 A D 2d 890; People v. Allen, 5 A D 2d 696). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 670, 257 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-watkins-nyappdiv-1965.