People v. Waters

81 A.D.3d 673, 916 N.Y.S.2d 791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2011·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered May 16, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his Batson challenges (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]) with respect to the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude African-American women from the jury. The prosecutor provided race- and gender-neutral explanations for excluding each of the prospective jurors at issue (id. at 97; see People v Smocum, 99 NY2d 418, 420 [2003]). The Supreme Court’s determination that these explanations were nonpretextual is entitled to deference on appeal and should not be [674]*674disturbed where, as here, it is supported by the record (see People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, 356-357 [1990], affd 500 US 352 [1991]; People v Fuller, 302 AD2d 405 [2003]). Prudenti, P.J., Angiolillo, Florio and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Waters, 81 A.D.3d 673, 916 N.Y.S.2d 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

81 A.D.3d 673 (People v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Joseph
2019 NY Slip Op 304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Tucker
131 A.D.3d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Adams
118 A.D.3d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Smith
98 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Dailey
86 A.D.3d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)