People v. . Waters

81 N.E. 1174, 188 N.Y. 632, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1319
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 21, 1907·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that while an oral warning by the seller that the butter is renovated but *633 ter is no excuse for a failure to comply with the statute, still, in view of the concession that the tub was marked according to the statute, the charge of the judge was "wholly immaterial; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. . Waters, 81 N.E. 1174, 188 N.Y. 632, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1319 (N.Y. 1907).

81 N.E. 1174 (People v. . Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.