People v. Wasylecki

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Wasylecki

172 N.W.2d 914, 19 Mich. App. 523, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 980

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 27, 1969

DocketDocket No. 4,665

StatusPublished

This text of 172 N.W.2d 914 (People v. Wasylecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wasylecki, 172 N.W.2d 914, 19 Mich. App. 523, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 980 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of breaking and entering a service station with intent to commit a larceny therein contrary to MCLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 28.305). He was assisted at his arraignment by counsel and his plea was determined to have been given freely and voluntarily with full knowledge of the potential consequences thereof. [524]*524He was sentenced to a term of 1-1/2 to 10 years in prison. Appellate counsel was appointed and defendant appealed.

Defendant asserts that the court erred in accepting his plea of guilty when he was not fully apprised of the consequences of waiving a jury trial. An examination of the transcript of the arraignment indicates that defendant was fully informed of the consequences of a guilty plea, and that he entered his plea knowingly and intelligently. .

There was no error in the acceptance of the plea of guilty.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of breaking and entering a service station with intent to commit a larceny therein contrary to MCLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 28.305). He was assisted at his arraignment by counsel and his plea was determined to have been given freely and voluntarily with full knowledge of the potential consequences thereof. [524]*524He was sentenced to a term of 1-1/2 to 10 years in prison. Appellate counsel was appointed and defendant appealed.

Defendant asserts that the court erred in accepting his plea of guilty when he was not fully apprised of the consequences of waiving a jury trial. An examination of the transcript of the arraignment indicates that defendant was fully informed of the consequences of a guilty plea, and that he entered his plea knowingly and intelligently. .

There was no error in the acceptance of the plea of guilty.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 N.W.2d 914, 19 Mich. App. 523, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wasylecki-michctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack