People v. Wasson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wasson

248 A.D.2d 763, 669 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2224

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 763 (People v. Wasson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wasson, 248 A.D.2d 763, 669 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered April 11, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of robbery in the first degree and petit larceny.

Defense counsel contends that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal and seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant. Based upon our review of the record, we agree. The record demonstrates that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced to the statutory minimum sentence. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, Iv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered April 11, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of robbery in the first degree and petit larceny.

Defense counsel contends that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal and seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant. Based upon our review of the record, we agree. The record demonstrates that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced to the statutory minimum sentence. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, Iv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 763, 669 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wasson-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack