People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Washington

135 A.D.3d 565, 22 N.Y.S.3d 849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 2016

Docket16679 542/07 543/07

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.3d 565 (People v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Washington, 135 A.D.3d 565, 22 N.Y.S.3d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ann M. Donnelly, J.), rendered February 10, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree and criminal sale of marihuana in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Any inconsistencies in the undercover officer’s testimony were minor and did not detract from his clear account of the events, which was corroborated by other evidence.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s pro se claims. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ann M. Donnelly, J.), rendered February 10, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree and criminal sale of marihuana in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Any inconsistencies in the undercover officer’s testimony were minor and did not detract from his clear account of the events, which was corroborated by other evidence.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s pro se claims. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Moskowitz, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.3d 565, 22 N.Y.S.3d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-washington-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack